The Haunting Poltergeist: Britain's Most Documented Haunting
The Investigation of 284 Green Street, Enfield, 1977 to 1979: Documentation of Phenomena Resisting Conventional Explanation
Classification: Unexplained Phenomena – Poltergeist Activity
Location: 284 Green Street, Enfield, North London
Date of Incident: August 1977 – 1979
Filed by: Investigator G.L. Playfair & M. Grosse
Status: Closed – Unresolved
On the evening of August 30, 1977, a distress call reached the Enfield police station in North London. The caller was Peggy Hodgson, a single mother of four living at 284 Green Street in the suburban expanse of Enfield. What began as a report of unusual knocking sounds would become one of the most extensively documented cases of alleged paranormal activity in modern British history, attracting international attention and dividing scientific opinion for decades to come.
The household at 284 Green Street consisted of Peggy Hodgson and her four children: Margaret, aged thirteen; Janet, aged eleven; and two younger boys. The property itself was an ordinary terraced house of the sort common throughout North London, built in the early decades of the twentieth century. The street was quiet and residential, populated by families who kept largely to themselves. Nothing about the street’s appearance suggested it would soon become one of the most scrutinised addresses in paranormal investigation.
How to support my work:
Both books also available on Kindle Unlimited
The first disturbances occurred during the night of August 29, 1977. Janet and Margaret were in bed when Peggy heard persistent knocking emanating from the walls of their bedroom. The sound was rhythmic and deliberate, unlike the random creaks and groans of an old house settling. Peggy investigated the bedroom but found nothing amiss. The knocking came again, sharper this time, as though something inside the plaster itself was demanding attention. Over the following hours, the noise intensified and began to move between rooms. Peggy became increasingly unsettled. By morning, she had made the decision to contact the police.
When officers arrived at the house on August 30, they entered with the measured scepticism that characterised police approaches to such reports. Peggy described the knocking sounds with evident distress. The officers listened carefully to her account, noting the details in their report book. As they stood in the daughters’ bedroom, the knocking sounds resumed. The officers heard them clearly. The noise appeared to originate from inside the walls themselves, yet no obvious source could be identified. More remarkably, as the officers watched, a chair in the bedroom moved several feet across the floor without any visible agency. There was no hand upon it. No draught through the room could account for such deliberate movement. The officers completed their report and left the premises. They could offer no explanation for what they had witnessed. The matter was formally noted but filed as inexplicable.
In the weeks that followed, the disturbances at 284 Green Street escalated dramatically. The simple knocking sounds evolved into a far more complex pattern of phenomena. Heavy furniture, including chest of drawers and bedsteads, began to move across rooms with apparent autonomy. Objects flew through the air with enough force to strike the children and cause minor injuries. Bedding was pulled violently from sleeping children. Most disturbingly, both children reported sensations of physical contact: being touched, pushed, and struck by unseen hands. Peggy, witnessing these incidents, found herself caught between maternal instinct to protect her children and a growing conviction that she was observing something beyond conventional explanation.
The local press became aware of the disturbances. By September 1977, the case had begun to receive coverage in the tabloid newspapers. The Daily Mirror published an article titled “The Enfield Horror” on September 1, 1977, which included interviews with Peggy Hodgson and photographs claimed to show objects in mid-air. The BBC commissioned a television segment that aired in October 1977, which presented both sceptical and sympathetic perspectives on the case. The Times published a critical analysis in December 1977 questioning the authenticity of the events and suggesting that the children, particularly Janet, might be deliberately orchestrating the disturbances as an elaborate hoax. The coverage transformed the case from a private family matter into a subject of public debate.
It was this media coverage that drew the attention of Maurice Grosse and Guy Lyon Playfair, both members of the Society for Psychical Research. Grosse was a researcher with considerable experience in cases of alleged poltergeist activity. Playfair, an author and investigator, had published extensively on paranormal phenomena. Both men saw in the Enfield case an opportunity to conduct systematic investigation of reported paranormal events with unprecedented access and documentation. They began their involvement in the autumn of 1977 and would maintain their investigation until 1979.
Grosse and Playfair set up recording equipment in the house to document the phenomena. They kept detailed journals of their observations. They interviewed the family members repeatedly, seeking consistency in their accounts and exploring any possibility of deliberate deception. What they recorded and observed formed the basis of their investigation. The knocking sounds were indeed present, occurring at irregular intervals and from apparently different locations within the house. The sounds were captured on audio tape, providing objective evidence of noise that the investigators could not account for through conventional means.
The most significant and disturbing phenomenon emerged in September 1977 when Janet began to speak in a voice markedly different from her normal eleven-year-old voice. The voice was deep, gravelly, and predominantly masculine. It frequently announced itself as “Bill,” claiming to be the spirit of a man who had died in the house. This claim was particularly striking because the investigators subsequently confirmed that a man named Bill Wilkins had indeed died in the house years previously, a fact that neither Janet nor the other children could have known through ordinary means. The voice speaking through Janet claimed that Bill Wilkins had died of a stroke while sitting in a chair watching television. The investigators recorded this voice extensively. When audio engineers and speech specialists examined the recordings, they noted that the voice characteristics were inconsistent with an eleven-year-old child producing ventriloquism or deliberate vocal manipulation. The acoustic properties suggested a deeper laryngeal structure than a child possessed.
The voice was neither pleasant nor benign. It spoke in profanities and insulted those present in the house. It made threats against the children. It claimed ownership of the house and demanded that the family leave. The voice also demonstrated apparent knowledge of events and details that seemed to support its claim of being a deceased former resident. This manifestation deeply troubled the investigators, who found themselves confronting a phenomenon that resisted straightforward explanation.
During this period, the children also reported increased physical assaults. Janet reported being struck repeatedly by unseen forces, leaving visible marks on her skin. She described the sensation of being grasped and pulled by invisible hands. Margaret reported similar experiences, though somewhat less frequently than her younger sister. The boys also reported incidents, though they seemed to experience phenomena less intensely than their sisters. The violence of these incidents escalated over several months.
Grosse and Playfair attended the house regularly, often remaining for extended periods. They observed phenomena personally. Grosse documented multiple instances of objects moving without apparent physical cause. He witnessed furniture shifting position. He heard the voice speaking through Janet. Playfair recorded extensive notes describing levitation phenomena involving Janet herself, claims that the child appeared to rise above her bed without support. Both investigators noted the consistency of the disturbances and the apparent inability of any family member to produce all the phenomena simultaneously or under controlled conditions. Yet both men remained troubled by what they could not explain.
The investigators considered and investigated multiple conventional explanations for the disturbances. They examined the house for structural defects that might produce sound effects. They investigated the possibility of underground water or geological activity that might cause vibrations. They considered the potential for electromagnetic phenomena or unusual atmospheric conditions. Each conventional explanation was tested and found inadequate to account for the full range of reported phenomena. Grosse and Playfair were forced to conclude that the events at 284 Green Street presented a genuine anomaly requiring explanation beyond the scope of conventional science.
The case began to attract the attention of other researchers and sceptics. Some paranormal investigators visited the house and reported their own observations of unusual phenomena. Sceptical researchers also attended, some of whom came away unconvinced of paranormal explanation but unable to identify straightforward fraud. The attention of multiple observers created a situation in which the phenomena were being documented from various perspectives, reducing the possibility that the investigation was being biased by the expectations or beliefs of the primary investigators.
Throughout late 1977 and into 1978, the intensity of the disturbances at 284 Green Street remained high. The family found themselves living in a state of constant tension. Sleep was disrupted. Daily life was affected by unpredictable events. Peggy Hodgson’s mental health deteriorated under the strain. She found herself simultaneously advocating for the reality of what was occurring in her home and struggling with public scepticism and accusation. Tabloid newspapers published articles suggesting that the entire affair was an elaborate fabrication by the children seeking attention. Some journalists questioned whether Peggy herself might be orchestrating the events for financial gain through publicity.
Local children began to gather outside the house, drawn by the notoriety of the case. Teenagers loitered in the street, hoping to witness unusual phenomena. Local residents developed conflicting views about the Hodgson family. Some sympathised with their evident distress. Others resented the disruption to the neighbourhood and the influx of media attention and curious onlookers. The house at 284 Green Street became transformed from a private dwelling into a site of public spectacle.
The investigators observed that the phenomena seemed to centre particularly around Janet. When Janet was present in the house, incidents were more frequent and more intense. When she was absent or removed from the house, the disturbances diminished significantly. This observation raised questions about the mechanism of the phenomena. It was considered as evidence potentially supporting either a psychological explanation rooted in Janet’s unconscious mind or evidence of her role in deliberately producing fraudulent effects. Grosse and Playfair had to grapple with the possibility that a child of eleven years old was capable of producing all the documented phenomena through trickery, and with the alternative possibility that something outside conventional understanding was occurring within the child’s vicinity.
In September 1978, a crucial incident occurred. Janet was observed to move around the house while the phenomena continued in other rooms. If the phenomena were the product of Janet’s deliberate fraud, this incident suggested that either she had an accomplice or that the phenomena could occur independently of her presence. Yet the incident did not conclusively resolve the question of authenticity, for it remained possible that accomplices existed or that the phenomena were sporadic rather than continuous.
By late 1978, the disturbances at 284 Green Street began to diminish in frequency and intensity. The violent physical assaults ceased. The voice of Bill Wilkins spoke less frequently and with less intensity. The object movements became less dramatic. By 1979, the phenomena had largely subsided. The house fell quiet. The Hodgson family reported a return to normal domestic life. The investigators concluded their involvement, documenting the case as essentially resolved through the cessation of phenomena, yet remaining unable to explain their root cause.
In 1979, Grosse and Playfair published a detailed account of their investigation titled “Poltergeist: A Study in Destructive Haunting.” The book presented their findings, their methodology, and their conclusion that the phenomena at 284 Green Street represented a genuine paranormal event that could not be adequately explained through conventional scientific understanding. Their publication sparked further debate, particularly amongst sceptical researchers who questioned whether the investigators had been susceptible to bias or whether they had adequately ruled out fraud.
The question of whether the phenomena at 284 Green Street were authentic or fraudulent has never been conclusively resolved. No definitive proof of deliberate deception has ever emerged. No fully satisfactory conventional explanation has ever been proposed. The case remains open to interpretation, with serious researchers and sceptics continuing to debate its significance. Some argue that the extensive documentation and multiple independent observations constitute evidence of authentic paranormal phenomena. Others maintain that human psychology, unconscious trickery, and the power of suggestion provide adequate explanation without requiring recourse to supernatural agency.
The Hodgson family continued to live at 284 Green Street for several years after the disturbances ceased. Eventually, they moved away, seeking to escape the legacy of the haunting and the public notoriety that had attached to their home. Peggy Hodgson lived out the remainder of her life in relative obscurity. Janet and Margaret grew into adulthood, leaving the house and their teenage experiences behind. No further significant disturbances were reported at the property after 1979.
The Enfield Poltergeist case remains one of the most thoroughly documented alleged paranormal events of the twentieth century. It has been referenced in academic discussions of paranormal phenomena, in popular culture, and in ongoing debates about the nature of consciousness and reality. The case demonstrates the difficulty of investigating extraordinary claims and the challenge of establishing truth when dealing with events that resist conventional scientific methodology. Whether the phenomena were paranormal, psychological, or fraudulent, the case of 284 Green Street in Enfield stands as a significant historical record of a mystery that continues to baffle and fascinate.